<snip>
> updateSortIndexAndDirection() method, it checks to see if you have
> more than one field specified in the sort. If so, then basically
> break out and leave the sortIndex variable at -1 resulting in no sort
> arrow appearing. Couldn't this have just put the arrow on the first
> sortField rather than stopping?
That's an option. For now though, reimplementing is the only way to do it.
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
