> LIMITATIONS: no more than one
application per CPU > Multiple applications per 1 CPU ok Aren't these two statements contradictory? - Gordon From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Eric D Anderson Hi, To clarify: FDS Express COST: Free LIMITATIONS: no more than one application per CPU. No
clustering (through J2EE) or load balancing (through hardware or software load
balancing) allowed. No multi-CPU deployments of FDS allowed. NOTES: Multiple applications per 1 CPU ok, 1 dual-core CPU ok. FDS Dept COST: 6K per CPU LIMITATIONS: No more than 100 concurrent users per application. NOTES: Can deploy on multiple CPUs, clusters, with load balancing. FDS COST: MSRP 20K per CPU (work with Adobe sales for the price that is
appropriate for your project) LIMITATIONS: none NOTES: Hope this helps.
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ian Skinner I would love to
hear if there is any other similarly priced server software technology (and I'm
not talking ERP or something) on the market. But has anybody
bothered to call and ask Adobe what this all means or are we all relying on
speculation and gossip of a news list and based on that information, judging
Adobe to have priced themselves out of the market. I suspect a company as
experienced as Adobe is very much aware of the market and what other similar
technologies go for. I would suspect
the way it might work is that a large organization would have a FDS server that
many other servers talk to for the FDS tasks. This is supposed to be a
multi-tier concept is it not? Do you guys running large enterprise systems put
an Oracle database server on all your web servers? We do not. That is my
uniformed 2cents. And since I know our organization can get by for a long time
on the free version and maybe, eventually, someday the 6k version; when and if
we get around to using FDS in the first place. So far what I have played with
works very well with the ColdFusion flash remoting connection, which is a free
upgrade to our ColdFusion license. I am not too concerned about the large
version for the foreseeable future. -------------- Confidentiality
Notice: This message including any attachments is for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you
are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete any copies
of this message. -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- RE: [flexcoders] What is the difference between versions ... Gordon Smith
- RE: [flexcoders] What is the difference between vers... Jack W. Caldwell
- RE: [flexcoders] What is the difference between vers... Matt Chotin
- RE: [flexcoders] What is the difference between vers... Jack W. Caldwell
- Re: [flexcoders] What is the difference between vers... Tom Chiverton