Hi Tim, The part I was referring to as 'dirty and hackish' was having to check to see if the data was actually new, due to the fact that the event/method fires whenever a row is scrolled in or out of view. I can only assume this is a bug and will attempt to report it as such unless someone informs me otherwise.
As for your suggestion about passing in the data from the parent, I am certainly open to suggestions. Can you explain a bit further or show a brief example? Thanks, Ben --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Tim Hoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Not at all. Overriding the set data function is commonly used. > What feels dirty and hackish to me, is getting the data inside of > the itemRenderer instead of passing it in from the parent. .02 :) > > -TH ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email. http://us.click.yahoo.com/6pRQfA/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/nhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
