Sorry, my last reply was not really clear with an example. Here is what I am seeing
package com.mysite.proj { [Bindable] public class myClass { public var myString:String; public var myObject:EventDispatcher; .... methods and such When I ASDoc this myString and myObject do not show up in ASDoc at all. If I remove the [Bindable] they do. This is the problem that I am seeing. Is this technique still valid? James --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Seth Hodgson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi James, > > > > Try putting your property documentation beneath the [Bindable] tag. > E.g.: > > [Bindable] > /** > * ... your property documentation ... > > */ > > public function get propX():X { ... } > > > > ASDoc comments apply to what they precede. > > > > Best, > Seth > > > > ________________________________ > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of james_dhap > Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 11:28 AM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [flexcoders] ASDoc ignores Bindable properties? > > > > Hey All, > I am seeing odd behaviour using the [Bindable] metadata tag in my AS > classes. When ever my public properties have the [Bindable] tag ASDoc > ignores them and does not generate comments. I first saw this with > some of my ValueObjects that use the metadata at the root of the > class, but even when I moved it to just one propety that property > disappears from the docs. > > At the moment its not a huge issue because its not really affecting my > documentation, but it will very shortly. Any tips? Possible > workaround ideas? Is this intended? > > James > -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/