--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "zenwarden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sometimes in Java I declare a constructor private ( I think this is > called the nullington pattern). Ex: utility classes that have all > static methods or constants. > > > > Can and should the same thing be done in flex? > > Chris
Yes, it's an OO design pattern not a Java specific one. I haven't heard of the nullington pattern, but private constructors are used for the Singleton pattern. Paul -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
