Daniel:
 
Thanks...the other thing I tried that worked was using the ||, so as per DeMorgans law:
 
A && B = !A || !B
 
Thanks

Sam


 
On 10/2/06, Daniel Wabyick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Ran into the same thing. Its that '&' is an entity in XML. So you can use:

enabled="{checkA == something &amp;&amp; checkB == somethingElse}"



Sam Shrefler wrote:
> Is there anyway to put a condition inside { } for example:
>
> enabled="{checkA == something && checkB == somethingElse}"
>
> Flex Builder throws an error "The Entity must immediately follow the &
> in the entity referecne. It seems to be a problem with the Logical
> Operator && since || works fine.
>
> Thanks
>
> Sam
>
>


__._,_.___

--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com





SPONSORED LINKS
Software development tool Software development Software development services
Home design software Software development company

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Reply via email to