----- Original Message ----- From: "boy_trike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <flexcoders@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 6:46 PM Subject: [flexcoders] Re: How many cfs's are TOO much
> --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Tom Chiverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 04 October 2006 22:33, boy_trike wrote: > > > most of my components have 2- 6 cfc (ie. AddRecord, UpdateRecord, > > > DeleteRecord, ReadRecords). Each one has a unique function to call it and > > > a result handler. Is there a better way to handle / group my cfc's. > > > > It would be normal to group all the CRUD (create read update delete) methods > > for an object into one CFC. > > > > -- > > I am not sure what you mean by NORMAL. Is there any performance hit by having 6 cfc's in a > component vs. 1? Is it better to have one large results function with a switch statement to > handle the results? > > thanks > bruce I don't think it's a question of performance, rather more a case of collecting related functions together - much along the lines of methods in an Actionscript class. Far easier to manage. Paul -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
