Re: [flexcoders] Re: [Flex 2] Strange behaviour when using RSLs

[Angus Johnson]

bumpI think there are a few of us looking to dynamically link framework swf's (as rsl's) into our work. Any further info?Is the RSL/linker guy back? :)ThanksAngus
On 29/09/06, Mike Morearty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:













  


    
            I don't think this is necessary.  I gave a pointer to how to 
recompile it because someone asked, but it is deliberate that we only 
ship a single swc: as I said, when you link that swc into your 
project, it strips out all the debug information.  There is no 
performance or size hit on your swf.  The Ant process is intended to 
be for people who really want to do some advanced stuff, like modify 
the flex framework, but for almost all users, it shouldn't be 
necessary.

The one use case where you might be right -- and I'm kind of unclear 
on this -- is the case where you want to dynamically link to the swc 
at runtime.

Does that make sense?  The expert on all this stuff is out on 
vacation right now -- I probably shouldn't have injected myself into 
this so deeply, because I'm the debugger guy, not the RSL/linker guy; 
I don't know all the subtle details of RSLs.  When the RSL/linker guy 
gets back, I'll ask him about this.

--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Anatole Tartakovsky" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mike,
> It might make sense to have separate folder in SDK with all the 
libraries
> compiled without debugging for size/performance reasons. 
Realistically,
> every production application would like to benefit from that and 
subjecting
> everybody to Ant process  - especially given the additional libs 
like fds,
> rpc, etc that come without sources. Please let me know if I should 
file
> feature request or if it is already done.
> Sincerely,
> Anatole Tartakovsky
> 
> 
> 
> On 9/28/06, Mike Morearty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >   Are you changing them to be external, rather than statically 
linked
> > into your app? Because if you're leaving them statically linked 
into
> > your app (the default), then there is no need to recompile them 
with -
> > debug=false; at link time, if linking the release swf, the linker 
will
> > strip out all of the debug information.
> >
> > If you are changing them to be external, then... take a look at
> > frameworks/build_framework.xml (an Ant script). I haven't tried 
it and
> > don't know much about it.
> >
> > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%
40yahoogroups.com>, "Anatole
> > Tartakovsky"
> > <anatole.tartakovsky@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Mike,
> > > Is there way to get standard libraries (framework, rpc, flex, 
etc)
> > built
> > > with -debug=false
> > > Thank you,
> > > Anatole
> >
> > 
> >
>


      

    
    












__._,_.___





--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com








   



    


  
  
    SPONSORED LINKS
  
          
                  
            
        Software development tool
      
                      
        Software development
      
                      
        Software development services
      
              
                        
            
        Home design software
      
                      
        Software development company
      
                    
           
  






      
      Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
      Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
      Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
           
        Visit Your Group 
       |
      
        Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
       |
      
       Unsubscribe 
       
 
    
  




__,_._,___