yeah thanks it was helpfull :)

On 10/11/06, EECOLOR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hello,
 
Its not that the concept of the for..in loop has changed (i think), but the way classes are defined internally has changed.
 
Properties and methods of classes that are defined inside the class definition will not change at runtime. This is (i think) why they are stored in a different place, it might even help prove performance (again, i think). So for the runtime player they are actually something else then the dynamic properties of an object (or an array).
 
I hope this helps in any way.
 
 
Greetz Erik


__._,_.___

--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com





SPONSORED LINKS
Software development tool Software development Software development services
Home design software Software development company

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Reply via email to