RE: [flexcoders] Re: FDS and componentized development: Bug?

[Peter Farland]

Ok, what about the channel endpoints?   From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Robson Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 2:26 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: FDS and componentized development: Bug? Hi Peter, Thanks for the reply. No, there is only one SWF. I have a main application MXML file that imports an ActionScript class. The ActionScript class has the FDS code. -Jim --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com, "Peter Farland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED].> wrote: > > Do you mean you have a parent SWF that loads another SWF that contains > FDS code? > > 1. Perhaps you have a relative channel endpoint specified in the config > and/or a programmatically created channel set. Try using fully qualified > URLs. Or perhaps you're loading the parent SWF from the file system > instead of via a URL? > > 2. Channels enforce a protocol, so the AMFChannel, for instance, > enforces that communication occurs over HTTP so it ensures the URL > starts with http:// - perhaps its having trouble working out what the > hostname and port are (hence why I asked about the relative versus > absolute channel endpoint). > __._,_.___ -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com SPONSORED LINKS Software development tool Software development Software development services Home design software Software development company Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___