have you tried something like
myTree.expandItem(myTree.openItems[1], false);
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "hank williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> lol. I am really retarded today. I redundantly restated what I
said in
> the subject, and then I spelled it wrong.
>
> On 12/11/06, hank williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Oh, by the way, this relates to the openItems property of the
Treee class.
> >
> > Hank
> >
> > On 12/11/06, hank williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The documentation for the openItems field says that it is
read/write
> > > and that the default is NULL, which presumably means no items
are
> > > open. But it appears there is no way to set open items to
closed.
> > > Below is the setter function for openItems and the first thing
it does
> > > is say if the parameter is null just skip it. This would seem
to
> > > contradict the implication of the documentation which is that
null is
> > > a valid value.
> > >
> > > But even looking closer it appears you can only use this
property to
> > > *open* an item. I've heard of property names being
descriptive, but
> > > this is going a little too far! Setting the value only opens
items!!!!
> > > As far as I can see there is no way this setter will ever
close an
> > > item.
> > >
> > > I'd love to hear that this is a bug and its being fixed or
that I am
> > > missing something. It would also be great if there is a work
around
> > > since I cant figure out a good way to take a snapshot of the
tree
> > > state for saving.
> > >
> > > public function set openItems(value:Object):void
> > > {
> > > if (value != null)
> > > {
> > > for each (var item:* in value)
> > > {
> > > _openItems[itemToUID(item)] = item;
> > > }
> > > openItemsChanged = true;
> > > invalidateProperties();
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > > Hank
> > >
> >
>
