It's very interesting how many "succesful" implementations of chaining events or commands developers are using. I think sequenceCommand in an attempt to be a pseudo abstract style class, doesn't solve the issue of when there is a chain of commands that need to be executed. Perhaps a best practice pattern should be included in cairngorm to deal with this issue, for the sake of consistency.
B On 21/12/2006, at 12:23 AM, Oliver Lietz wrote: > Am Dienstag, 19. Dezember 2006 22:39 schrieb thegiffman: > [...] >> Could someone set me straight here? > > You can create commands (and delegates and services) which dispatch > success > and failure events. This gives you a very flexible mechanism to chain > commands (or even execute them in parallel) or operations in your > delegates/services and decouples your commands from the mx.rpc.* > stuff. I did > that in my framework and it works fine for web (remoting) and desktop > (wrapped/with filesystem access) applications. > > O. > > > > > > -- > Flexcoders Mailing List > FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders% > 40yahoogroups.com > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
