Why would it be dumb to use trace? It's a neat way of doing a quick debug. The debugger is not always the best choice.
Not sure why the trace will not work when called with the whole package name, probably because it's build in globally. Why not just simply use trace()? Sascha _____ From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derek Vadneau Sent: Wednesday, 03 January, 2007 01:07 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Call to a possibly undefined method trace I have a class that has a method called trace. I wanted to test that method so I used trace ... I know, dumb. Anyhow, I tried using flash.utils.trace(message) to specify the trace I wanted to execute. That gives me a compile error: Call to a possibly undefined method trace. Perhaps this is academic since I can get around the issue by calling another class' method or using a textfield, etc., but just so that it's clear, why can't I target flash.utils.trace? -- Derek Vadneau
