The problem turned out to be (as you and one other person pointed out as one of the possible reasons) that the returned object was not really of type Expr. Expr was defined as an interface and the remote object method was returning an instance of ExprImpl with ExprImpl type implementing Expr. Once I changed the RemoteClass mapping of Expr.as to ExprImpl from Expr, things worked - don't get ObjectProxy anymore.
Vijay --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Farland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You'll have to determine why an ObjectProxy is being created... > typically it's because an anonymous Object was returned and RemoteObject > had makeObjectsBindable="true" (which it is by default). > > As for why an anonymous Object was returned - either something like a > java.util.Map was returned instead of the type you expected, or the > com.foo.Expr class was not available to the native deserializer in the > Flash Player at the time the response was received. > > Your AS3 (and Java, for the reverse situation) Expr class must also > possess a constructor that allows for no-arguments instantiation. > > Depending on how classes are being loaded by your SWF (they can be > lazily loaded in Flex applications) the underlying call to > flash.net.registerClassAlias() (that is generated for you by the mxmlc > compiler because you added [RemoteClass(alias="com.foo.Expr")] metadata) > may not have executed before the response was received. > > Another reason is that no reference was made to the ActionScript > com.foo.Expr class in your Flex application and hence the mxmlc compiler > never linked the class definition into the SWF. I don't think this is > the cause as you appear to make a reference to the class in the result > handler (and I imagine you also imported this class in order for it to > compile). > > As a last ditch effort you could try making a static reference to your > class somewhere in your application, like: > > private static var dep:Class = Expr; > > or I guess you could even call flash.net.registerClassAlias on your own > and not rely on the generated code. > > Actually, that begs the question, are you using MXML? Or are you working > with a pure ActionScript application? > > Pete > > > > ________________________________ > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of moonusamy > Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 11:23 AM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Invoking RemoteObject method - Type Coercion > error > > > > > In the debugger: > event.result seems to be of type ObjectProxy > It shows a child of type Object that in turn contains a "root" Object > corresponding to a data member of my Expr class called root of a type > called Node. > In addition to this child object, event.result also shows a "root" > child Object. > Since my method returns an Expr object, what I'd expect to see is > event.result to be of type Expr and to be able to do: > var expr:Expr = Expr(event.result); > var node:Node = expr.root; > > Thanks > Vijay > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > , "michael_ramirez44" > <michael_ramirez44@> wrote: > > > > Loop through the properties on the event.result to see if it does > > contain the same public properties as you Expr.as class. > > > > Michael Ramirez > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , "moonusamy" <vijay.k.ganesan@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'm using RemoteObject to invoke a server-side Java POJO method that > > > returns an object of type com.foo.Expr. I have Expr.java and Expr.as > > > with Expr.as annotated with [Bindable] and > > > [RemoteClass(alias="com.foo.Expr")] > > > > > > I try to reference the returned value in the result handler in my > > mxml > > > as follows: > > > private function fooResultHandler(event:ResultEvent):void > > > { > > > myexpr = Expr(event.result); > > > > > > TypeError: Error #1034: Type Coercion failed: cannot convert > > > mx.utils::[EMAIL PROTECTED] to com.foo.Expr > > > > > > I expect event.result to be of type com.foo.Expr which it doesn't > > seem > > > to be. What do I need to do to get to the object of type Expr that > > my > > > method invocation returns? > > > > > > Thanks > > > Vijay > > > > > >
