Very interesting :) I'll remember that in future occasions.

--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, slangeberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That'll work with any cache-busting you need to do. I use it in 
testing, to
> un-cache the swf file itself, when viewed on server. Ie: send rand 
var in
> url and if it's present, pass it in to swf call (swfobject + php, 
here):
> 
> var so = new SWFObject( "ProductBuilder.swf?rand=<?=$rand?>",
> "product_builder", "100%", "100%", "9", "#FFFFFF");
> 
> Saves me the 'pain' of going through some menu to clear browser's 
cache, not
> to mention losing your browser's cache, in order to update one 
element!
> 
> -Scott
> 
> On 14 Mar 2007 08:44:42 -0700, Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >   Wow! O_O' Works flawlessly!! :-D
> >
> > Many thanks for that trick dude!
> >
> > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > slangeberg <slangeberg@> wrote:
> > >
> > > With Flash, I've learned to do the lo-tech method of attaching
> > random
> > > numbers to the path. Simple, but it's been effective!:
> > >
> > > url:String = resource + "?rand=" + Math.floor(Math.random() *
> > 100000);
> > >
> > > -Scott
> > >
> > > On 14 Mar 2007 08:07:52 -0700, Alex <uspsyko@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi there!
> > > >
> > > > I have an xml file that needs to be loaded eventually using a
> > > > URLRequest. I'm trying to avoid loading a cached file using 
these
> > > > headers:
> > > >
> > > > urlRequest.requestHeaders.push(new URLRequestHeader("Cache-
> > > > Control", "no-cache, no-store, max-age=0, must-revalidate"));
> > > > urlRequest.requestHeaders.push(new URLRequestHeader
> > > > ("Expires", "Fri, 30 Oct 1998 14:19:41 GMT"));
> > > > urlRequest.requestHeaders.push(new URLRequestHeader
> > > > ("Pragma", "no-cache"));
> > > >
> > > > It works ok in firefox and IE6.0.2900, but I still obtain a
> > cached file
> > > > in IE6.0.3790+ and IE7.
> > > >
> > > > Do I need to add any more headers? or what's the problem here?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > : : ) Scott
> > >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> : : ) Scott
>


Reply via email to