Please mail me the overloaded bubble series class. My email address is gaurav1146 at yahoo.com TIA Gaurav
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "simonjpalmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think it would be illuminating for you to set a breakpoint in the > updateTransform method of the BubbleSeries class and check out what > flex is doing with renderData.filteredCache. This is what it uses to > compute the bubble sizes. > > You are right, there is no min bubble size, and the basic transform > scales the radius, not the area of the bubble, which I find very > misleading. What it means is that two bubbles that are a factor of > two different in terms of their radiusField value are actually 4 times > different in area. This confused the hell out of our users and was > logged against us as a bug. > > I can share an overloaded bubbleseries class with you that I have > adjusted to have a min bubble size and which scales the area according > to the radiusField and not the radius. Ely Greenfield deserves a > mention here for helping me out with it. > > Let me know if you want the class and I'll email it to you. > > SP > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "gaurav1146" <gaurav1146@> wrote: > > > > What you say seems fine that the size of bubbles should change based > > on the data set that is displayed. But the problem is that the size of > > all the bubbles that are on display after the slide do not change. > > Lets say if initially 6 bubbles were displayed on the chart and after > > the slide motion only 3 are displayed. Then what is happening is that > > in remaining 3, the sizes of only 1 or 2 bubbles change while the size > > of one of them may remain totally unaffected by the slide. Also the > > size changes are drastic such that even big bubbles are reduced to > > nearly point sized bubbles. > > > > I do have a maxRadius set up im my bubbleSeries but there seems to be > > no option for minRadius. > > > > TIA > > Gaurav > > > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "simonjpalmer" <simonjpalmer@> > > wrote: > > > > > > do you have the same set of bubbles visible after your slider > > > "magnification" as before? > > > > > > The default bubbleseries sizes the bubbles *that are displayed* > > > relative to one another based on the radius field (the series has a > > > display list that it uses for sizing). > > > > > > If you add or remove bubbles the relative sizes of the remaining > > > bubbles change. They still refer to the radius field, but because > > > they are a different set they will have different proportions. > > > > > > Do you have max and min bubble sizes set? > > > > > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "gaurav1146" <gaurav1146@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I have created a chart which consists of LineSeries and bubble > series > > > > something like > > > > <mx:CartesianChart> > > > > .... > > > > <mx:Series><mx:LineSeries../><mx:BubbleSeries ..../></mx:Series> > > > > </mx:CartesianChart> > > > > > > > > The sizes of the bubble initially displayed proportionately > based on > > > > the radiusField in the BubbleSeries. But, now I have added a HSlider > > > > based of which a user can see/magnify different section of the > chart. > > > > Based on position of the slider I slice the ArrayCollection that > > > > provides data to the series. > > > > But, the problem after adding the slider is that the bubble sizes > > > > sometimes do not appear proportionate to the radiusField of the > bubble > > > > series. I could not figure out the reason for this. Any help > would be > > > > greatly appreciated. > > > > TIA > > > > Gaurav > > > > > > > > > >
