I agree that Adobe is ignoring a large market. The low cost remoting product kind of already exists in open source, third party, and in house solutions. What Adobe is doing with Live Cycle is capturing the niche markets that do need PDF workflow in their RIA Applications. These companies have deep pockets and will use these for projects that can save them millions of dollars a year.
I don't think that Adobe needs to have the low cost remoting product in their line, and I think that Adobe is counting on third parties and the community to provide those solutions. Paul --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Scott Barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I got could point for point with you and sound like a goose, but overall, > I'll push back with a question. How many people on this list are in need of > PDF work flow generation vs Remoting that's easier to work with on both JAVA > and .Net while at the same time have a low cost barrier. I'd like to think > that Scrapblog.com concepts could do more with Adobe technology, instead > they had to shop around and thankfully WebORB folks have a descent product > to cope with this burden. > > LiveCycle is just not ready to be slotted into RIA as it's still somewhat > foreign to the "RIA" momentum. It's forcing the issue. > Microsoft has more to learn, and I'll be sure to flog them where I can to > make that happen. I'm in Seattle next week and i'm not there to eat > lunch/dinners and party, I have reasons and it's to do with Web 2.0 and RIA > :) > > -- > Regards, > Scott Barnes >
