Ian,
Let me ask, what are your intentions? What is the purpose of the pinned
instance?
Then I could explain why I over engineered what Doug put so simply :)
Peace, Mike
On 5/7/07, Michael Schmalle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One way you could do this is with a Spacer before the last child box to
push it to the bottom. Nice 'n' easy in static mxml.
That is an easy way also if you do not have flexible children. When I was
answering his question I was seeing in my head a layout independent of the
view children.
Peace, Mike
On 5/7/07, Doug Lowder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One way you could do this is with a Spacer before the last child box
> to
> push it to the bottom. Nice 'n' easy in static mxml.
>
> <mx:Spacer height="100%" />
>
> --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, Ian
> Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Is this possible in a standard 'vertical' layout VBox, or does one
> have
> > to go 'absolute' layout?
> >
> > I have a VBox displaying 1-N child boxes, and I want one to be pinned
> to
> > the bottom. Is this possible or do I need to wrap an absolute layout
> > around this?
> >
>
>
>
--
Teoti Graphix
http://www.teotigraphix.com
Blog - Flex2Components
http://www.flex2components.com
You can find more by solving the problem then by 'asking the question'.
--
Teoti Graphix
http://www.teotigraphix.com
Blog - Flex2Components
http://www.flex2components.com
You can find more by solving the problem then by 'asking the question'.
