Hi Stephen, I understand what you have in the doc. What I am asking if there is any way to override the default behavior so instead of "... args" I could put my own specific argument descriptions.
Thanks, Mark --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Gilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Basically, we explain it all in the description for the parameter. Like: > > * @param ...args A value of any data type (such as numbers, elements, or > strings), etc. etc. > > Stephen > > ________________________________ > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Mark Piller > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 12:16 AM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [flexcoders] Documenting "... args" with ASDoc > > > > Does anyone know how to document arguments for a method declared as: > > public function foo( ... args ):void {} > > Ideally, I'd like to specify individual @param arguments (there's a > reason why the method does not declare specific arg types). However, > ASDoc seems to recognize only the first one and puts "... args" as the > argument name in there. > > Thanks, > Mark >
