It looks like the mx:Metadata tag might also allows for comments, but i haven't personally confirmed that. See RichTextEditor.mxml for what I'm talking about.
Daniel Freiman nondocs <http://nondocs.blogspot.com> On 6/7/07, Stephen Gilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is only limited support in ASDoc for MXML files. - All ActionScript entities defined in an <mx:Script> block, such as properties and methods, appear in the output. Items defined in MXML tags do not appear in the ASDoc output. - You can only insert an ASDoc comment in an <mx:Script> block of an MXML file. - The superclass corresponds to the first tag in the MXML file. For an application file, that tag is the <mx:Application> tag and therefore an MXML application file appears in the ASDoc output as a subclass of the Application class. Stephen ------------------------------ *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *borekbe *Sent:* Thursday, June 07, 2007 10:42 AM *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com *Subject:* [flexcoders] ASDoc for MXML components? Hi all Is there a way to generate API documentation from MXML components? So far, I thought that MXML and ActionScript are just different ways to express the same things but if I can't generate documentation, this practically means that I can't use MXML for component development at all. I hope it's not the case because MXML is much more suitable for certain scenarios... Thanks, Borek
