Alex: > If you don't need the cache, why not just use SWFLoader? becuase I care about the cache in relations to images loaded from the web, but not when it comes to the .swf icons which I will embed.
Ely - thanks, that worked like a charm :-) ... and also thanks for creating this great component! - Bjørn On 19/09/2007, Ely Greenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Down at the bottom of the commitProperties() routine, add an extra else > clause to the big if statement: > > > > Else if (newSource is DisplayObject) > > { > > _content = newSource; > > } > > > > That should in theory take care of it. > > > > Ely. > > > > > > > > *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On > Behalf Of *bjorn - > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 19, 2007 7:04 AM > *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > *Subject:* [flexcoders] How would you go about to make SuperImage support > .swf? > > > > SuperImage: > > http://www.quietlyscheming.com/blog/2007/01/23/some-thoughts-on-doubt-on-flex-as-the-best-option-orhow-i-made-my-flex-images-stop-dancing/ > > > > > I need it to support .swf's - but I don't worry about the cache part - as > long as it shows the swf. > > > > I guess it would have to be done in the commitProperties() function - > somewhere here: > > > > if(newSource is Class) > { > // if it's a class, instantiate it. > newSource = new newSource(); > } > > // if it's bitmap or bitmap data, we know how to render that. > if(newSource is Bitmap) > { > _content = newSource; > } > > } > > > > .. an embedded swf would be a class. Is there a way to convert this to > Bitmap so that SuperImage behaves as normal? > > > > Bjørn > > -- > > ======================== > http://www.juicability.com - flex blog > http://www.43min.com - funny movies > > > > -- ======================== http://www.juicability.com - flex blog http://www.43min.com - funny movies