Alex:
> If you don't need the cache, why not just use SWFLoader?
becuase I care about the cache in relations to images loaded from the web,
but not when it comes to the .swf icons which I will embed.
Ely - thanks, that worked like a charm :-) ... and also thanks for creating
this great component!
- Bjørn
On 19/09/2007, Ely Greenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Down at the bottom of the commitProperties() routine, add an extra else
> clause to the big if statement:
>
>
>
> Else if (newSource is DisplayObject)
>
> {
>
> _content = newSource;
>
> }
>
>
>
> That should in theory take care of it.
>
>
>
> Ely.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
> Behalf Of *bjorn -
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 19, 2007 7:04 AM
> *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* [flexcoders] How would you go about to make SuperImage support
> .swf?
>
>
>
> SuperImage:
>
> http://www.quietlyscheming.com/blog/2007/01/23/some-thoughts-on-doubt-on-flex-as-the-best-option-orhow-i-made-my-flex-images-stop-dancing/
>
>
>
>
> I need it to support .swf's - but I don't worry about the cache part - as
> long as it shows the swf.
>
>
>
> I guess it would have to be done in the commitProperties() function -
> somewhere here:
>
>
>
> if(newSource is Class)
> {
> // if it's a class, instantiate it.
> newSource = new newSource();
> }
>
> // if it's bitmap or bitmap data, we know how to render that.
> if(newSource is Bitmap)
> {
> _content = newSource;
> }
>
> }
>
>
>
> .. an embedded swf would be a class. Is there a way to convert this to
> Bitmap so that SuperImage behaves as normal?
>
>
>
> Bjørn
>
> --
>
> ========================
> http://www.juicability.com - flex blog
> http://www.43min.com - funny movies
>
>
>
>
--
========================
http://www.juicability.com - flex blog
http://www.43min.com - funny movies
