Without thoroughly digesting your issue description, SequenceCommand has proven buggy in the past. Just FYI.
Ben --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Giles Roadnight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Actually, I stand corrected. > > Each call is sent from a different Command object, the results are all > passed back to the same instance however. > > The delegate call looks like this: > > var call : Object = new Object( ); > call = _service.Execute( "Shopping." + obj.type + methods[ obj.saveType ], > meta, param ); > call.addResponder( _command ); > > this calls an renaun:RemoteObjectAMF0 service so perhaps the problems lies > there? > > Thanks > > Giles > > On Oct 31, 2007 2:58 PM, Giles Roadnight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi All > > > > I'm quite new to sequence commands but they are used extensively at my > > new job. > > > > At the moment I am trying to save a large number of items. I am using > > a sequenceCommand to do this although in this case it is not being > > used as part of a sequence. > > > > In the command I have a private variable that holds the ID of the item > > that is being saved. When the save is complete an event is dispatched > > with the ID in so that I can keep track of which items have been > > saved. This all happens in parallel. > > > > The problem is that all of the saved Events come back with the ID of > > the last item that was saved. All of these events seem to be using the > > same instance of the command to save so the id is overwritten each time. > > > > Is this a feature of the sequence command? Will I have to make a > > non-sequence copy of this command? > > > > Thanks > > > > Giles > > > > > > > > > > -- > Giles Roadnight > http://giles.roadnight.name >
