i tracked the article down here - http://weblogs.macromedia.com/swebster/archives/2006/08/why_i_think_you.cfm for those that are interested.
--- In [email protected], "nathanpdaniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Not even remotely sure this is where the comments from Cairngorm > came from (those made by 'Adobe' saying to 'steer clear') - but if > you look at tutorials in getting started with Cairngorm, the author > gives a rather lengthy list in reasons not to use it. The guide is > sorta like a Yes-No answer sheet - if you answer yes, continue to > the next question, if no then stop. If you make it through the > entire list then Cairngorm is a good consideration. I haven't taken > the time to find the tutorial I'm refering to, but it shouldn't be > hard, it's on the Adobe website, getting started with Cairngorm > (something to the effect) :D > > --- In [email protected], "Tim Ashworth" <tim@> wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > I've just finished my first app with Cairngorm, and like the > framework a > > lot. However I was having a chat with a CF Uber nerd and he told > me that > > he'd been chatting to someone at Adobe on the flex team who > specifically > > told him to "steer clear of cairngorm." > > > > I'm surprised as I thought Adobe was really pushing flex guys to > use > > Cairngorm. Is there something I should know, or is this merely > the opinion > > of a coder who doesn't like Cairngorm particularly? > > > > I know this is a subjective question, and I'm not trying to start > a "my > > framework's better than your framework" conversation, but I am a > bit > > concerned that I may have picked the wrong horse if someone inside > Adobe > > doesn't think it's up to much. > > > > Anyway, I look forward to the replies, and I suppose unless there > is a damn > > good reason I'll crack on with Cairngorm (mainly 'cos I've been > using it so > > much recently) > > > > Cheers > > > > tim > > >
