--- In [email protected], "Johannes Nel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > you don't have to use the default one > look at overriding getChildren >
To do that, I would have to implement all of the ITReeDataDescriptor interface; which I might do in any case, but for a simple Tree, with no root, how does the default getChildren(node:Objct) work if it has no root object to pass in? Thats my basic question - is this is a design flaw?
