Most of the time, folks just need to pick out one field from the data
object, often the same as the label.  Leaving dataTipFunction as null
and setting dataField works for those situations.  If dataTipFunction is
not null, the datatips are always shown.  If you must use
dataTipFunction, I would subclass the item renderer and alter then its
tooltip property is null.

 

________________________________

From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of stuartward
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 8:32 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Datatip in datagrid not working properly

 

Thank you very much for your reply. So it seems the documentation is 
not correct regarding datatips.

Please help me understand your statement, "Otherwise, it should 
require clipped text." --- Does this mean that if I used another 
function or property it would work as I want it to? How do I 
accomplish showing a tooltip/datatip-like feature only for cells 
with clipped text?

Thanks,
Stuart

--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
, "Alex Harui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you used dataTipFunction, it will show up regardless of clipping.
> Otherwise, it should require clipped text.
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>

[mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
] On
> Behalf Of stuartward
> Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 2:34 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> 
> Subject: [flexcoders] Datatip in datagrid not working properly
> 
> 
> 
> I have enabled showDataTips in the columns of a datagrid. The 
datatips 
> show up for all cells regardless of whether the text is clipped or 
not.
> 
> According to the Flex 3 documentation:
> "If you enable data tips, they only appear for fields where the 
data is 
> clipped."
> 
> I only want to show the datatip for cells that have clipped text. 
What 
> am I doing wrong?
> 
> Thanks for your help,
> Stuart
>

 

Reply via email to