I found another way that seems to work (not sure why though):
var testUint:uint = 1;
var testInt:int = -1;
var testNumber:Number = 1.1;
var obj:Object = testUint;
trace ("uint: " + (obj is uint && obj is int));
trace ("int: " + (obj is int && !(obj is uint)));
trace ("Number: " + ((obj is Number) && !(obj is int) && !(obj is uint)));
Output:
uint: true
int: false
Number: false
obj = testInt;
trace ("uint: " + (obj is uint && obj is int));
trace ("int: " + (obj is int && !(obj is uint)));
trace ("Number: " + ((obj is Number) && !(obj is int) && !(obj is uint)));
Output:
uint: false
int: true
Number: false
obj = testNumber;
trace ("uint: " + (obj is uint && obj is int));
trace ("int: " + (obj is int && !(obj is uint)));
trace ("Number: " + ((obj is Number) && !(obj is int) && !(obj is uint)));
Output:
uint: false
int: false
Number: true
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Whitelock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks! That did help, but it doesn't seem to work for a uint. Here's
> my test code:
>
> var testUint:uint = 1;
> var testInt:int = -1;
> var testNumber:Number = 1.1;
> var testString:String = "test";
> var testDate:Date = new Date();
> var testArray:Array = new Array();
>
> var test:Array = [testUint, testInt, testNumber, testString, testDate,
> testArray];
>
> for (var i:uint = 0; i < test.length; i++) {
> var typeInfo:String = describeType(test[i])[EMAIL PROTECTED]();
> trace(typeInfo);
> }
>
> And here's the output:
>
> int
> int
> Number
> String
> Date
> Array
>
> I'm guessing there's no way to identify a uint -- is that correct?
>
>
> --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Harui" <aharui@> wrote:
> >
> > There is code that might help in
> > DataGrid.as:itemEditorItemEditEndHandler
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Paul Whitelock
> > Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 12:31 PM
> > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [flexcoders] How to tell if variable is an int, uint, or a
> > Number?
> >
> >
> >
> > I have a situation where an untyped variable is passed in a method
> > call and I need to determine the data type for the variable. My first
> > thought was to use typeof, but typeof returns "number" for an int,
> > uint, or a Number. The operator "is" will not work on primitives.
> >
> > Is there any way to determine the data type of an untyped primitive
> > object?
> >
>
