If you have: <mx:Component id="inlineEditor" className="MyClass"> <mx:Canvas/> </mx:Component>
You get a subclass of Canvas named MyClass, and a local public scoped instance of an IFactory called inlineEditor, right? -Josh On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Alex Harui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you've defined a component via <mx:Component>, the name is > auto-generated as Josh says, but it generates an IFactory, so you can use > the factory to get new instances > > > > <mx:List id="myList> > > <mx:itemRenderer> > > <mx:Component> > > <mx:Canvas> > > .. > > > > > > From AS: > > > > myList.itemRenderer.newInstance() > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On > Behalf Of *rafaelrfc00 > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 23, 2008 9:53 PM > *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > *Subject:* [flexcoders] Re: new Component() ? > > > > Text was just an example. > > It can be date, text, textarea, some other customcomponents. I was > just curious how i would create item renderes without creating a file. > > I thought if you are able to use <mx:component> you would be able to > create it from actionscript as well. > > guess i was wrong. Flex didn't think about everything, do they? :P > > raf > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, "Josh > McDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Well no, you can't do what you're asking :) > > > > When you use: > > > > <mx:component> > > <canvas> > > ... > > </canvas> > > </mx:component> > > > > It's creating a new subclass of Canvas with a generated name, and > you can't > > create new classes at run-time without bytecode manipulation (which > isn't > > really an option in Flex yet unfortunately). > > > > But what exactly are you trying to achieve? If you're just > displaying text, > > but it needs to be different to the field data, what you need is a > > labelFunction, not an itemRenderer. > > > > -Josh > > > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Rafael Faria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Pedro, > > > > > > How do you mean about putting some getters? Can you give me an > example? > > > > > > Thanks > > > Raf > > > > > > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, > "Pedro Sena" <sena.pedro@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Rafael, > > > > > > > > What do u think of put some getters in your object instead of create > > > various > > > > item renderers that just have little funcionality ? > > > > > > > > Just my 2 cents > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > > > -- > > > Flexcoders Mailing List > > > FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > > > Search Archives: > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo! Groups > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for > thee." > > > > :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald > > :: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -- "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee." :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald :: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
