Essentially, the actuall classname isn't StockVO, it is [EMAIL PROTECTED] If the portion after the @ matches it is effectively stripped off so you can just see and use StockVO in most places
So it doesn't really match. This will be extremely useful in Flex 3.2 when you can mix sub-application built with different versions of Flex, but is a pain for module users like yourself. Of course, the easiest way to use StockVO in both modules is to get it linked into the main app. Most VOs are small so it won't matter. The SharedCode Module pattern is for heavy things. ________________________________ From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of donald_d_hook Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 5:52 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Type Cast Error Alex - I looked at your presentation. I am using the StockVO in both pages (both modules). I need to use it in both. If I define the class in both places, what does it matter, its the same class? I saw where you mentioned having common code by loading a "Shared Code" swf that would apply to ALL modules. I guess I can give that a shot. Thanks again for your time! --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , "Alex Harui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It is picking up the class from a different application domain. See the > modules presentation on my blog. > > > > ________________________________ > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> ] On > Behalf Of donald_d_hook > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 10:22 AM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [flexcoders] Type Cast Error > > > > I receive a type cast error when I try to cast an object I received > from the server (an arraycollection of value objects). I get the > following: > > TypeError: Error #1034: Type Coercion failed: cannot convert > com.spinnaker.model::[EMAIL PROTECTED] to com.spinnaker.model.StockVO > > The actionscript object has the correct remoteClass. On top of that, > this only happens the 2nd time into the page. Not sure what is > happening behind the scenes, nor do I know what the @3b392b81 is. > > Thanks in advance >
