Excellent explanation Tim!

I think, from my perspective, that the Rb standard, that I have, will be 
sufficient....and should be good for an FMT.  That coupled with my Wavetek 
5120, will allow me to measure frequencies to about 1/10hz, which is about as 
good as I can do here due to Doppler issues.  In actuality, I have been able to 
get good measurements to 1/100 hz by interpolation; but, my goal is just to get 
to 1/10hz.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Right now am fighting an issue that has cropped up when using the Flex in scope 
mode with a narrow bandwidth (10hz).  Periodically I see some low frequency 
signals that interfere with my hetrodyne measurements.  It does not occur all 
the time; but, it is frequent.  I suspect that I have a ground loop or that I 
have some device in the shack that is causing interference.

I will try to track this down tomorrow.  Am going to eliminate all antenna 
sources and feed the Rb 10mz signal directly into the Flex via a simple padding 
arrangement to lower the input level.  I would expect no problems.  Then I will 
start introducing other devices into the equation one-by-one until I find the 
problem.

The symptoms are when in AM mode, looking at WWV, with no BFO or synthesizer or 
Rb running, I see a strong, low frequency, beat signal in the scope.  Its 
appears that the BFO is running; but, its not.

George
K2CM

________________________________________
From: Tim Ellison [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 10:25 PM
To: George R Allen; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [FlexEdge] Rubidium or GPS disciplined,    External Standard for 
the F5K

" Are there any advantages for me to consider a GPS disciplined standard?"

Depends on what your objectives are.

The short term frequency stability of a GPS alone is fair.  A combination 
(system) of a GPS disciplining a low cost XO, that by its nature is not highly 
accurate or stable, has the advantage of short term frequency stability via the 
XO and long term stability via the GPS. It is a good cost effective system.

A Rb clock source can provide a highly accurate and stable clock frequencies, 
but it has to establish a good thermal equilibrium before it is "rock solid".  
Also you have to periodically calibrate it due to very long term drift and 
aging.

The ultimate solution is the combination of the two; where the Rb is phase 
locked to and disciplined by the GPS, provide the best results.  If the GPS 
loses satellite lock, the Rb clock can maintain accurate and stable frequency.  
You can improve the very long term frequency accuracy of a Rb clock from 10^-9 
to 10^-12 which is close to the accuracy and stability of a Cs clock.

I have just a Rb source that is contained in a forced air  ventilated cabinet 
and is fairly thermally stable, it runs all the time so there is no "warm up" 
period needed when I operate.  I have a 10 MHz distribution amp on it so it is 
a common time base for stuff in the shack that needs or can use external 
clocking. This meets my needs fairly well.

I would love to have a GPS disciplining the Rb clock, but I have not found a 
cost effective solution to mate with the LPRO-101.

So the obvious question is do you *need* that level of accuracy and stability.  
Maybe if you are driving microwave transverters or are into FMT.  Or you could 
be like me and try to squeeze the best performance you can out of your "toys".


-Tim


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of George R Allen
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 5:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [FlexEdge] Rubidium or GPS disciplined, External Standard for the F5K

I read somewhere that the GPS disciplined standards are more accurate than the 
Rubidium standards.  As a external standard for the F5K, does it really matter?



The specs for my Rubidum Standard appear to be astounding to me.  Are there any 
advantages for me to consider a GPS discliplined standard?



Thanks



George

K2CM




_______________________________________________
Flexedge mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz
This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge.  It is used for 
posting topics related to SDR software development and experimentalist who are 
using beta versions of the software.
_______________________________________________
Flexedge mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz
This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge.  It is used for 
posting topics related to SDR software development and experimentalist who are 
using beta versions of the software.

Reply via email to