since we have many broadcast station in EU from 6Mhz or let say 6.144
+ - is flex going to make sure will not going to hear this station tx from 
6.144 etc on the 6m or any top band since there was not clear answer about this 
it is very very important this issue will be test 100% under strong BC station


vy 73 
E.P  g0uut/dl9fcc 

 


From: Gerald Youngblood <[email protected]>
To: Jim R <[email protected]> 
Cc: "<[email protected]>" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Saturday, 26 May 2012, 12:53
Subject: Re: [FlexEdge] [Flexradio] Differences between the 5K & 6K ?

Jim,

Even though it slices and dices you can still push to squawk to your hearts 
content. ;)

73,
Gerald

Sent from my iPad

On May 25, 2012, at 9:20 PM, Jim R <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Yes and soon you won't even have to operate the radio. Just go to work and 
> while away, the radio will find the DX entities you need, make the qso's and 
> log contacts. Through voice synthesis, it may even complete SSB contacts. To 
> keep it legal, you can set up your I-phone or Android for continuous 
> monitoring and control if necessary. All that is too stressful for me and I'm 
> old fashioned. I love nothing better than a good long relaxed rag chew about 
> radio equipment, life and family so I'll be staying in front of my 5000 
> operating one band at a time and for a thrill while making an occasional rare 
> DX contact, use RX2 for those wide splits or to just visually monitor another 
> band for activity while that band is muted.
> 
> Each to his own,
> 
> 
> Jim
> K5HY
> 
> 
> 
>> From: [email protected]
>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 21:49:05 -0400
>> Subject: Re: [FlexEdge] [Flexradio] Differences between the 5K & 6K ?
>> 
>> Don't forget that there is a computer which can watch bands for you. You
>> don't have to monitor all 8 slices by yourself.
>> 
>> Here are a few ideas that could be implemented into the onboard processing
>> (in radio) or streamed to the computer for post processing:
>> 
>> <brainstorm>
>> 
>> .With 8 slices, your computer can monitor all cw/digital parts of every band
>> simultaneously and decode it all. Your computer could alert you when it
>> finds a DXCC entity that you don't have yet.
>> .As the hobby evolves with the technology, maybe even voice transmissions
>> will have digital stamps encoded into them so that even SSB transmissions
>> can be identified and partially decoded by computers.
>> .The radio could always be monitoring the harmonic frequencies of the main
>> band you are listening to, and correlate the harmonic frequencies with the
>> main band to detect people who might be inadvertnatly transmitting
>> harmonics. 
>> .Your computer could listen for long delayed echoes using SETI style
>> software. Monitoring 3MHz of bandwith can increase your chances.
>> .For VHF contesting where you work the same person multiple times in a row
>> on an increasing band, you could utilize the 8 receivers combined with some
>> specialized transverter multiplexing hardware (different IF frequency for
>> each band) that would enable you to monitor multiple bands simultaneously,
>> and allow you to work someone on the higher band without abandoning post on
>> the lower band. This would give a huge advantage to VHF contesters,
>> especially single op stations that done have a warm body to operate each
>> band.
>> .You could monitor all 2m repeaters and simplex channels simultaneously,
>> record them all and play them back later. Your computer could learn the
>> signatures of your buddies voice and radio and even alert you when they key
>> up, regardless of what repeater they jump on.
>> .A club could purchase the radio and put it in the contest station. 8 users
>> could use it to monitor the bands simultaneously. 
>> 
>> </brainstorm>
>> 
>> And so much more that hasn't been thought up yet.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> This really is a game changer.
>> 
>> Greg, N2GZ/1
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim Fuller N7VR
>> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 8:57 PM
>> To: 'flexedge'
>> Subject: Re: [FlexEdge] [Flexradio] Differences between the 5K & 6K ?
>> 
>> Bob,
>> This most helpful and most troubling.
>> 
>> All,
>> 
>> This changes the game in a way that is difficult for my pea pick-in brain to
>> comprehend.
>> 
>> With 8 Slices, I am having problems envisioning what to do with them.
>> 
>> I have only to ears and two eyes. If I put one slice on a right audio
>> channel and a second slice on a left audio channel, then that leaves 6
>> channels for the eyes. I am beginning to understand that these might
>> contribute to sensory overload. But then I had to learn not to talk on the
>> phone and text my kids;-) this leave all kinds of possibilities that I find
>> interesting.
>> 
>> I am glad that it will be a bit before these will be delivered. It will take
>> me some time to work this through the computer between the ears to
>> understand all of the repercussions.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Jim Fuller
>> N7VR -- http://www.n7vr.org 
>> International TCP/IP Gateways Robot Operator -- http://www.ampr-gateways.org
>> 
>> MTAPRS NET Server Operator -- http://www.mtaprs.net 
>> CWOP-2 -- http://www.wxqa.com 
>> IRLP Node 3398 - http://irlp.fuller.net 
>> Original ARECC contributor
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert McGwier
>> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 10:07 PM
>> To: David Painter
>> Cc: flexedge
>> Subject: Re: [FlexEdge] [Flexradio] Differences between the 5K & 6K ?
>> 
>> All slice receivers will be independent and the "SDR" which follows will
>> set the mode, etc. There is a software limitation on the subreceivers in
>> PSDR that has more to do the limitations imposed by the way audio was
>> delivered in the, system than, it had to do with the SDR code and the way
>> the control surface was implemented in the GUI.
>> 
>> The limitations of the slice receivers are that in the 6700, four of the 8
>> are hooked to one AD and therefore hooked to one antenna and the other 4
>> are hooked to a different AD and to a separate antenna source. For
>> dynamic range and IP3 enhancements the two different AD can be hooked
>> together to the same antenna.
>> 
>> The bottom line is the answer is yes, what I said is right and I hope the
>> elaboration helps and doesn't confuse.
>> 
>> Bob
>> On May 24, 2012 5:59 PM, "David Painter" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Bob,
>>> 
>>> That statement is only partly true...isn't it??
>>> 
>>> Its true that in PSDR we have a multiwatch facility but it does not 
>>> support independent mode/filters etc.
>>> 
>>> Will each of the 8/4 slices in the 6700/6500 be capable of supporting 
>>> multiwatch/mutireceivers with independent mode/filters etc???
>>> 
>>> There is no multiwatch functionality in the second receiver at all, 
>>> although its been promised for many years, let alone independent 
>>> mode/filters etc
>>> 
>>> G4PNX - David
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert McGwier" 
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> To: "Jerry Flanders" <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 10:03 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Differences between the 5K & 6K ?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> In the 6700, there are 8 slice receivers but each of those will be 
>>> capable
>>>> of supporting multiple sub RX as in PSDR. We have not decided how 
>>>> many software receivers to run on the DaVinci per slice and if we 
>>>> did, how you might use them.
>>>> 
>>>> Right now, I want one per slice to be perfect.
>>>> 
>>>> Bob
>>>> On May 24, 2012 11:44 AM, "Jerry Flanders" <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> OOPS! I just re-read the PDF brochure: "Slice Receivers allow you to
>>>>> simultaneously visually and audibly monitor multiple frequencies 
>>>>> within the same band or multiple bands ". Looks like we will have 
>>>>> audio to use.
>>>>> Multiple means at least 2, and maybe 4/8. I don't see the hardware 
>>>>> connection points, so maybe we will have audio streaming over the 
>>>>> ethernet to the PC client. My error.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jerry W4UK
>>>>> 
>>>>> At 10:10 AM 5/24/2012, Jerry Flanders wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> At 09:51 AM 5/24/2012, Tony Estep wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:26 AM, W1JCW <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ....wanted to know what significant gains there would be...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ============
>>>>>>> John, a significant gain is that the new design can receive 
>>>>>>> several slices of spectrum at once. In other words, you can run a 
>>>>>>> number of the lightweight display/control windows at the same 
>>>>>>> time, each pointing to different frequency slices. They can be on 
>>>>>>> different bands, modes, etc.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We know that reception as panadaptor views of those 4-8 slices are 
>>>>>> planned, but we don't know if we will have audio from 4-8 "receivers"
>>>>>> available for use in some worthwhile way. Might be disappointing to 
>>>>>> assume that ordinary functions will all be available in an 
>>>>>> extraordinary radio, then find they are not.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Jerry W4UK
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ______________________________****_________________
>>>>>> FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/****mailman/listinfo/flexradio_****
>>>>>> flex-radio.biz<http://mail.flex-radio.biz/**mailman/listinfo/flexra
>>>>>> dio_**flex-radio.biz>
>>>>>> <http://mail.**flex-radio.biz/mailman/**listinfo/flexradio_flex-rad
>>>>>> io.* 
>>>>>> *biz<http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-rad
>>>>>> io.biz>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Archives: 
>>>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/****flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/<http://
>>>>>> www.mail-archive.com/**flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/>
>>>>>> <ht**tp://www.mail-archive.com/**flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/<http:/
>>>>>> /www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage:
>>>>>> http://www.flexradio.com/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ______________________________****_________________
>>>>> FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/****mailman/listinfo/flexradio_****
>>>>> flex-radio.biz<http://mail.flex-radio.biz/**mailman/listinfo/flexrad
>>>>> io_**flex-radio.biz>
>>>>> <http://mail.**flex-radio.biz/mailman/**listinfo/flexradio_flex-radi
>>>>> o.** 
>>>>> biz<http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio
>>>>> .biz>
>>>>>> 
>>>>> Archives: 
>>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/****flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/<http://w
>>>>> ww.mail-archive.com/**flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/>
>>>>> <ht**tp://www.mail-archive.com/**flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/<http://
>>>>> www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/>
>>>>>> 
>>>>> Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage:
>>>>> http://www.flexradio.com/
>>>>> 
>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/**mailman/listinfo/flexradio_**flex-radio.
>>>> biz<http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.
>>>> biz>
>>>> Archives: 
>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/**flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/<http://www.
>>>> mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/>
>>>> Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage:
>>>> http://www.flexradio.com/
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----
>>>> No virus found in this message.
>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>>> Version: 2012.0.2176 / Virus Database: 2425/5019 - Release Date: 
>>>> 05/24/12
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Flexedge mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz
>> This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge. It is used
>> for posting topics related to SDR software development and experimentalist
>> who are using beta versions of the software.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Flexedge mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz
>> This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge. It is used
>> for posting topics related to SDR software development and experimentalist
>> who are using beta versions of the software.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Flexedge mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz
>> This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge. It is used 
>> for posting topics related to SDR software development and experimentalist 
>> who are using beta versions of the software.
>                        
> _______________________________________________
> Flexedge mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz
> This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge.  It is used 
> for posting topics related to SDR software development and experimentalist 
> who are using beta versions of the software.

_______________________________________________
Flexedge mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz
This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge.  It is used for 
posting topics related to SDR software development and experimentalist who are 
using beta versions of the software.
_______________________________________________
Flexedge mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz
This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge.  It is used for 
posting topics related to SDR software development and experimentalist who are 
using beta versions of the software.

Reply via email to