Actually this was taken from the last "Flex Insider" with the idea of the receiver being smart enough to adjust to a particular band. So, there is this possibility but "SDR" in itself lends all kind of possibilities.
73's Joe > Define "SMOP" > > Small matter of programming From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia > (Redirected from SMOP) > > In software development, Small Matter of Programming (SMOP) or Simple > Matter of Programming is a phrase used to ironically indicate that a > suggested feature or design change would in fact require a great deal of > effort; it often implies that the person proposing the feature > underestimates its cost. Such underestimated costs are common during > cost estimation, particularly near the beginning of a project. > > The Jargon File describes an SMOP as: > > 1.A piece of code, not yet written, whose anticipated length is > significantly greater than its complexity. Used to refer to a program > that could obviously be written, but is not worth the trouble. Also used > ironically to imply that a difficult problem can be easily solved > because a program can be written to do it; the irony is that it is very > clear that writing such a program will be a great deal of work. âIt's > easy to enhance a FORTRAN compiler to compile COBOL as well; it's just a > SMOP.â > > 2.Often used ironically by the intended victim when a suggestion for a > program is made which seems easy to the suggester, but is obviously (to > the victim) a lot of work. Compare minor detail. > > > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:05 AM, James T Kirk wrote: > >> SMOP >> >> On 11/27/2012 9:04 AM, [email protected] wrote: >>> If I understand correctly from information regarding the Flex 6000; >>> it >>> might be possible that SmartSDR will give the Flex 6000 the ability >>> to >>> decide receive parameters that will raise or lower sensitivity >>> depending >>> on band conditions (automatically). If the band is wide open with a >>> high >>> noise level the Flex 6000 would attenuate the receive sensitivity to >>> bring >>> the unwanted noise level down thus eliminating hearing fatigue. If >>> the >>> band is not so good just the opposite would happen with raising >>> sensitivity. Of course this would be within the range of the receive >>> preamp / attenuate parameters. Would it be possible for the operator >>> to be >>> able to define the noise level parameter(db) as this maybe different >>> for >>> operator choice? Anyway, I am just pondering the vast possibilities. >>> >>> 73's >>> Joe >>> WD5Y >>> >> >> -- >> Sent from my Communicator >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Flexedge mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz >> This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge. It is >> used for posting topics related to SDR software innovation and other >> technical SDR topics. > > _______________________________________________ > Flexedge mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz > This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge. It is > used for posting topics related to SDR software innovation and other > technical SDR topics. _______________________________________________ Flexedge mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexedge_flex-radio.biz This is the FlexRadio Systems e-mail Reflector called FlexEdge. It is used for posting topics related to SDR software innovation and other technical SDR topics.
