Joel Harrison wrote: > NO! > > 73 Joel W5ZN > It is possible to read the rules with a "guilty conscience" and see them saying that. I agree with your interpretation since every contester or paper hanger on the planet would be in the illegal camp at least once.
Bob N4HY > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Naruta > Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 6:39 PM > To: Christopher T. Day > Cc: Terry - W0VB; flexradio@flex-radio.biz > Subject: Re: [Flexradio] First SDR1000 to SDR1000 EME Contact Made on Two > Metersbetween W5UN and W0VB on August 16, 2006 > > Would revealing the details of the contact > invalidate the contact, by the ARRL rules? > > > Mike - AA8K > > > -- AMSAT VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, TAPR, Packrats, NJQRP/AMQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR Wrk Grp Chairman "You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat. You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles. Do you understand this? And radio operates exactly the same way: you send signals here, they receive them there. The only difference is that there is no cat." - Einstein _______________________________________________ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com
