Re: Bob McGwier's post:

With the advent of the twisted /trusted computing /and the DRM signed 
driver requirements as well as new
hardware requirements for Vista compatible boards, we may be in deep 
weeds in the future. The great strength of Software Defined
Radio can also be its Achilles heel, if Vista is any indication. The 
radio could be held hostage to Microsoft's dictates.
It appears, near as I can tell, in this convoluted (to me) scheme of 
Microsoft's that we WILL be held hostage to the
whims of Microsoft with increased costs and loss of freedom to use our 
computers as we see fit when we install
Vista.

The philosophy behind SDR is individual flexibility and freedom by using 
infinitely configurable software to be the "guts"
of the radio. The use of software allows almost infinite flexibility. 
This presupposes that the OS and the hardware (PC)
itself is constructed/made with no "built-in" restrictions. When we get 
hardware and software requirements that add
such restrictions, the law of unintended consequences will really 
increase the complexity of our systems in the future
and potentially severely limit our options. Development costs for both 
software and hardware could potentially soar,
making our SDR's as, or more, expensive than the rigs competing with SDR 
(such as IC-7800, etc).

Maybe I am crying wolf here. But if I am not, the conversion of SDR to 
Linux  is of paramount importance. Dependence
upon Microsoft/Apple may be a severe mistake for SDR for the masses.

My wife just promised me an SDR, and other goodies, early in 2007. Now I 
am not so sure...

What do Eric, Gerald and the others think?

Brad
KE4XJ


_______________________________________________
FlexRadio mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com

Reply via email to