I agree. I read it as a suggestion to write an honest review, and the hopeful wish, the reviewer has enjoyed their SDR. A good idea, and a nice wish.
Unfortunately, there are many negative judgemental critical folks who are humor impaired, who shout about faults they find in others, when it is their own blindness that obscures the good. Chaplain Don > Ed Haskell wrote: > I took Ken's 5/5 to be a tongue in cheek comment. I don't think it's an > ethical issue in any case. > > On 3/9/07, John P Basilotto W5GI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Please forgive Ken's exuberance. >> >> Anyone who posts to eham.net should state their findings as they see it. >> And >> if it's not 5/5 so be it. >> >> Feedback, good or bad, is a good thing and helps us to do a better job. >> 73 >> >> >> The feedback >> >> John P. Basilotto >> W5GI >> Marketing and Product Manager >> FlexRadio Systems >> 512-535-5266 >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ross Stenberg >> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 7:10 AM >> To: 'Ken N9VV'; 'Flex-radio Reflector'; 'SDR-1000 Users Discussion Group' >> Subject: Re: [Flexradio] please enter your eHam SDR-1000 review >> >> Sorry, but this is not a very ethical request from a FlexRadio employee. >> >> 73 Ross K9COX _______________________________________________ FlexRadio mailing list FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ FlexRadio Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ FlexRadio Knowledge Base: http://kb.flex-radio.com/
