Let me clarify my point that CPU usage has been steadily on the rise
in every release of PowerSDR.  I think I saw Eric say he saw a 3% jump
for skins support.  My 30% was from a really old version to pretty
betty, which encompasses a lot of changes, not just skins.  -Scott,
WU2X


On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Scott McClements<kc2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well I guess you can't please all the people all the time. I think the
> whole point of skins is that *any* look *is* possible. I can
> definitely say that CPU usage is on the rise with these changes. On my
> single core machine, CPU usage on Pretty Betty is 30% higher (on
> average) than it was with version 1.10. In fact that makes 192Khz
> nearly unusable now. But - computers become outdated, newer software
> relies on faster machines and more cores. Now I have a good reason to
> stimulate the economy and get a new Intel i7 machine.
>
> -Scott WU2X
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Duane - N9DG<n...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> --- On Wed, 6/17/09, Brian Lloyd <brian-wb6...@lloyd.com> wrote:
>>
>>> .... Contrast and edge-definition
>>> makes the
>>> controls easier to spot with your eyes. Also anything that
>>> leaves more
>>> processing power to the radio functions is strongly to be
>>> desired. I
>>> don't want to give up a single CPU cycle to "eye-candy" if
>>> I don't have to.
>>
>> Yes I 100% agree. And the comment about "contrast and edge-definition" 
>> squarely hits the nail on the head. That is one of everal things that I 
>> really dislike about the progress bars, icons etc, of the Windows Vista's UI 
>> defaults (and many other new software products in general as far as that 
>> goes). Everytime I work with Vista in the lab at work the screen looks like 
>> a collection of "mushy" objects and blurry lines. And the "melted/polished 
>> glass" look of the icons, progress bars, etc. I also find to be straining on 
>> the eyes, and not the least bit of any improvement - in fact I see it as 
>> being a general step backward in UI "design and looks" because it seeks to 
>> make you focus on the item (picture) on the computer screen as a real world 
>> object. I don't want that. I want to look/see *beyond* the item *on* the 
>> computer screen and instead optimize the presentation of what the 
>> water/panadapter is actually representing. In short I don't want to see 
>> pictures of
>>  "physical objects" - I want to let the computer and the program's UI to 
>> show me the "abstract", or in other words, the things that I cannot normally 
>> see, i.e. RF spectrum.
>>
>> The idealized look of the UI for me is a nearly 100% screen sized 
>> padapter/waterfall with a an absolute minimum of "controls" around it. I'm 
>> also becoming increasingly convinced that virtually all of the adjustments 
>> that I would want to routinely make can be done from *within* the visual 
>> space of the panadapter/waterfall itself.
>>
>> As a side note: I'm finally getting some time to actually run this stuff 
>> again after a lengthy "shack all dismantled" downtime. Currently am 
>> re-familiarizing myself with the PowerSDR version that I had last used - 
>> 1.12 (yes that far back). I soon plan to warp ahead a year or so to the 
>> current released version + the various SVN's. I expect that experience to be 
>> very enlightening given my "hands on" absence from the 1000/5000a & PowerSDR 
>> for the better part of a year..
>>
>> Duane
>> N9DG
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
>> FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
>> http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
>> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
>> Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/  Homepage: 
>> http://www.flex-radio.com/
>>
>

_______________________________________________
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/  Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/

Reply via email to