Seems (at least for me individually) that reduced graphics update rate would be acceptable tradeoff (vs. signal processing) in this kind of machine/usage (example, in battery-dependent portable operation) - certainly not a full replacement for desktop machine but still usable.
Thank you for the comments, Dave -----Original Message----- From: "Simon (HB9DRV)" <si...@hb9drv.ch> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 16:45:13 To: <wb0...@hotmail.com>; <flexradio@flex-radio.biz> Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Interesting machine possibly as companion to Flex1500 It's the horsepower in processing the graphics - I see serious problems with the normal N270 netbooks - I can code around this, but the graphics part is very weak when it comes to high-speed updates. Simon Brown, HB9DRV www.ham-radio-deluxe.com <http://www.ham-radio-deluxe.com> ----- Original Message ----- From: "david feldman " <wb0...@hotmail.com> Why should the graphics performance be a significant factor in this machine type --- isn't power-sdr just using generic graphics primitives, or is it dependent on hardware acceleration and directx/opengl? _______________________________________________ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/ Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
