There has been a lot of "opinionating" on the upcoming version of PowerSDR 2.0 
that has the feature of being able to graphically represent the fixed control 
surfaces of the console.  Whether or not you like the "artist" rendition of the 
console "skins" or not seems to be a popular topic with equal and passionate 
feelings on both side of the debate but in reality, changing the look and feel 
of PowerSDR v2.0.0 to anything other than what it is currently, and debating it 
further is a moot point.

The reason it is moot is twofold.  First, FlexRadio has already decided that 
PowerSDR should have the ability to define the fixed control surfaces 
graphically and that there would be a new look to PowerSDR.  That business 
decision is not going to be undone since it was made almost a year ago and 
significant development resource went into the program logic to do so, so it is 
not a negotiable point.

Second, in their infinite wisdom, FlexRadio Systems engineered this capability 
with enough ease and flexibility to be able to create your own presentation of 
the console.  Even a user with a rudimentary knowledge of using a graphics 
editor (and I resemble that remark) can make what ever skin they like.  If you 
don't like some aspect of the skin, change it yourself - it is easy to do.  
There are more important and *much* better uses of developer's time than making 
the new PowerSDR look like the old one.  It is easy to deduce that a 
representation of the old console is not going to come out of FlexRadio for 
PowerSDR v2.x.x, so if you want to retrograde back to the past, then it will 
have to be up to some enterprising ham to create a "Clinical Betty" skin that 
looks like the old console.  I also suspect there will be some enterprising 
forward thinking hams out there that will create some new really cool looking 
presentations for the PowerSDR console.  I am really looking forward to using 
those.

While it is not widespread, complaining about how the representations look, 
belittling the graphic's designers work and being overly critical without 
providing constructive criticism is not beneficial to the evolutionary process 
or the on going improvement of PowerSDR and does not serve the betterment of 
SDR software in general.  There is conservatively a few hundred thousand 
man-hours of software development that have been put into PowerSDR over its 
lifetime, for which everyone gets for free.  Show the developers some respect 
in this regard - they have earned it several times over.  You really do not 
want to piss off the people who have contributed to PowerSDR without 
compensation, so as they say, "Don't look a gift horse in the mouth".  Be 
thankful at this time of thanksgiving.  You should be showing your appreciation 
positively to Eric and the rest of the team who have made SDRs possible for us 
all.  Thank you Eric, Bob, BobT, Frank, Beppe, Matt, Ed and the others who I 
have forgotten to name.

The other debate seems to be over CPU utilization.  Yes, it does take 
additional resource to load a more graphically rich application like PowerSDR 
v2.0.0 vs. PowerSDR 1.x.  If your PC is "long in the tooth" the additional 
resource load might not be negligible.  On my Core2 machine it is negligible.  
Even those who want the "original skin" back, it is still going to take the 
same amount of computer resources as any of the other skins so reverting back 
to the older look will make no difference.  That is the price of progress.  If 
it doesn't work with your PC to your liking, then stick with the v1.18.3 
version or upgrade your PC.  It is what it is.

Also, this thread has probably run its course and technically it belonged on 
the FlexEdge reflector because PowerSDR v2.0.0 is still alpha software, so lets 
get back and focus on topics that are more appropriate for this reflector.

I hope everyone in the US is enjoying their holiday weekend.  I am off to make 
another turkey sandwich :-)

-Tim
-----
W4TME


_______________________________________________
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
Knowledge Base: http://kc.flex-radio.com/  Homepage: http://www.flex-radio.com/
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to