On 9/25/2012 1:00 PM, flexradio-requ...@flex-radio.biz wrote:
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 22:18:52 -0700
From: Brian Lloyd<brian-wb6...@lloyd.com>
To: John Vandenberg<jvandenbe...@shaw.ca>
Cc: FlexRadio Mailings<flexradio@flex-radio.biz>
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] U/V sub-audible tone problem
Message-ID:
<CAE3hgTcjm-xNmqS_pgbH+d4Z=PvxfR2QJgOdEXhV5BYBO9A=-w...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:25 PM, John Vandenberg<jvandenbe...@shaw.ca>wrote:
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: U/V sub-audible tone problem
> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 21:05:08 -0400
> From: John Vandenberg<jvandenbe...@shaw.ca>
> To:flexradio@flex-radio.biz
>
>
>
> The newest version here seems to have the same problem with PL tones not
> being filtered out on receive. Did I miss a setting somewhere or is
> this a bug? They are annoying on receive.
>
Did you try using the 10-band EQ to knock down the audio spectrum below
250Hz? Yes, I know that is a hack but it might make it tolerable.
No I have not. It likely would work. However I think a "Flex" could do
better then that. It only should filter out the particular PL tone
rather then a large frequency range to maintain quality base tone
reproduction. Also I don't like to having to use different receive
profiles for FM repeaters with and without PL tones. It becomes messy
at best. It would also give Flex an edge up in clarity. I don't think
it would be hard to implement.
John, ve3dvv
_______________________________________________
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://www.flexradio.com/
