Also have to agree. Sometimes it seems even a simple google search was not performed prior to asking such questions
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S® III mini, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Army Curtis <a...@suddenlink.net> </div><div>Date:04/28/2015 7:50 PM (GMT-08:00) </div><div>To: vk3...@dcsi.net.au, FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz </div><div>Subject: Re: [Flexradio] flex 1500 </div><div> </div>Hello David. I have to agree with you. One of the few things that intrigues me even more are the people who feel compelled to reply to such questions who either have not read the question correctly, or have no experience in the matter being asked, but answer anyway. And of course there are some "hams" who apparently cannot figure out how to match a call sign to a name. Ain't life great? Cheers mate. 73, Army AE5P -----Original Message----- From: FlexRadio [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of vk3...@dcsi.net.au Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 5:55 PM To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz Subject: Re: [Flexradio] flex 1500 I am continually intrigued by the inane questions being asked on this forum by people who surely must have a few brains otherwise they would not have ham licences. There is a 150 page manual out there. Read it first, then if something is not clear, ask your question. _______________________________________________ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz _______________________________________________ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz _______________________________________________ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz To opt out of the Reflector: http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
