>On Fri, 15 Mar 2002 14:20:49 -0500 > >>Michael Selig writes: > >> > If we do add the myriad properties for many aircraft configuration >> > types to LaRCsim.cxx it means adding lots of code I think. >> >> > [3] The properties structure is pretty general. It seems like it >> > would be pretty easy to trample over someone else's property >> > definitions and/or make poor/improper usage of them? Is there a >> > standard list of reserved properties? > >David M. replied: > >>Nothing's been finalized, but I haven't heard any screaming >>objections. When you want to put information into one of the existing >>subtrees like /surface-positions or /engines, it would probably be a >>good idea to post a short message to see if the other FDM maintainers >>are willing to go along. > >Jon replies: > >The best solution would be for the UIUC guys to bite the >bullet and port their work to use JSBSim. :-) :-) :-) > >Jon > Support :-)
_______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
