> In ATC.cxx change: > > int FGATC::RemovePlane() { > } > > to > > int FGATC::RemovePlane() { > return 0; > } > > to fix your compiler error. > > The problem in approach.cxx is the good old (for int i= ... > business. Alexander - MSVC6 can't scope variable declarations > within a for loop declaration properly so you need to do
> int i; > for(i= ... { > } > for(i= ... { > } > > instead of > > for(int i= ... { > } > for(int i= ... { > } > > which works on conforming compilers. > Ok, sorry for this. I will try to remember it for the future. Is anybody going to fix this in the CVS tree? What do I have to do if I want the gcc compiler under Linux to return an error if a routine of type non-void is defined but no value is returned? BTW, how is updating of the CVS tree handled for this project? I suppose there is a limited number of people who are allowed to upload, who is it? Cheers Alexander _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel