Julian Foad wrote: > > Christian Mayer wrote: > > > > Note: You 2nd version does *not* use the string concatenation. > > > > The 2nd version boils down to the very C++ dependant > > > > operator<<(operator<<(operator<<(cout, "usage"),endl),...); > > > > Yes, it does. What point are you trying to make by saying "very C++ dependant"? >Nearly all of FlightGear depends on C++. That syntax is the first thing taught in >any book on C++, and is just as suitable for use by experts as by beginners. >
I wanted to point out the very big (internal) differnce of the ANSI C style "string1" "string2" THat ends up as "string1string2" in a normal array of char vs. The C++ way: cout << "string1" << "string2" wich uses the operator<<() method. Both are valid and have their pro and cons. But they are fundamentally different (and the later doesn't use the string concatenation), although cout << "string1" "string2" and cout << "string1" << "string2" produce the same output. CU, Christian -- The idea is to die young as late as possible. -- Ashley Montague Whoever that is/was; (c) by Douglas Adams would have been better... _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
