> I definitely agree. It's a violation of almost every netiquette rule, > that is concerned to virus-like behaviour or bandwith respect of > others.
I disagree. Almost _every_ new Microsoft-based program checks its home website, sometimes for logging and sometimes anonymous as in this case. It is really interesting to use a linux firewall for a modern MS system. In this case, the bit I object to is simply (1) that the transfer doesn't get cached (hence my CVS comment) (2) that there is no fallback for low bandwidth clients _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
