On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 13:35:47 -0400, 
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Arnt Karlsen writes:
> 
>  > ..IMHO, we should have more "oddball EAA" planes than spam cans and
>  > 
>  > airliners.  Blom&Voss 141, Me 323, Me 163, and the Horten Vings, 
>  > Howard Hughes Spruce Goose, Van's RV3-4-5-6-7-8-9, Rutans
>  > Vari-Viggen, VariEze, Defiant, Lancair IV, Colomban Cri-Cri, Zenair
>  > CH-801, Ryan "Spirit of St Louis", Leza AirCam, the Hummelbird, the
>  > Volksplane etc.
> 
> Sure, but I'm also interested in getting FlightGear set up as a decent
> general-aviation FTD -- some of the stuff in the flight schools is
> ancient, and FTD's are way overpriced.

..a "market" and a tool.  I agree.  GA is mainly built on volonteered 
efforts, like in aero clubs.  Also add to the geek factor as in 'done 
the right way', as GA is not mainstream, either.  ;-)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.


_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to