Jon Stockill writes: > >From a processing point of view this makes sense - you don't need to store > extra information about the location of the airfields, wher if as was > suggested before it's broken down by state, then presumably you need to > store the state for each and every airfield too, or is there some other > method of telling which state each one is in that I've missed?
We're going to want to store that anyway, though, if only for the user pick-an-airport interface. Besides, it makes a lot more sense to pick a maintainer for all California airports than it does to pick a maintainer for all airports with an ICAO code starting with "KB". All the best, David -- David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
