James Turner writes: > This was a two hour hack I did to learn a bit more of the code, it was > fun to do, and the end result is quite nice. It could use some polish > (rounding off some digits), and while performance seems okay I'm > worried on 'big' nodes it might be a hit. I'm simply using the > propertyNode's changeListener API, so presumable there are some nodes > in the tree which are not firing their valueChanged() methods when they > should be
Currently, the property tree knows about changes only when someone changes a value through it; when a property is tied to C++ code, the valueChanged() method is never fired. All the best, David -- David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
