Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Jim Wilson wrote: > > David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > >>I am very happy that we are reorganizing the mess under /controls, but > >>unfortunately, we've landed in a bit of a deeper mess that will need > >>some fixing. The changes just committed for the base package are > >>extremely incomplete: many of the YASim flight models under > >>Aircraft-yasim/ and many of the joystick config files have not been > >>updated. > > > > It isn't clear to me when an O/S project should consider the interests of > > users and "third party" developers (if there is such a thing). Obviously the > > base package should be updated, but wouldn't it make sense to provide some > > sort of backwards compatibility with an alias table or something like that? > > No one objected in advance.
No one reading the list regularly, that is. This isn't intended to be an objection by any means, just something to think about. I really have no idea what impact this might have. Best, Jim _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
