Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 10:55:00 -0500, > "Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> We really don't have separate base packages for separate OS's. We >> have one base package (.tar.gz and .tar.bz2 versions) and then we have >> a separate Windows .zip version since a lot of windows people don't >> have unix style archive extraction tools on their windows machines. > ..can these use tarballs named .tgz instead of .tar.gz etc ? I'd vote for another approach. PowerArchiver for Windows, unlike WinZip, _is_ able to deal with .tar.gz archives - at least Version 6.11 does (definitely, just tested). >From the FAQ, that's contained in the 6.11 package: Q: What is the difference between PowerArchiver and other archive utilities? A: PowerArchiver is easier, it's FREE and it has more features than most other archive programs. [...] Q: Can I put a link to your page from my home page? A: Yes, you are very welcome to. On the PowerArchiver web site you can find small pictures of "PowerArchiver Now" which you can freely put on your page and link to http://www.powerarchiver.com Q: Can we put PowerArchiver on our CD-ROM or distribute it with our magazine? A: Definitely! I will be very happy that you did. �nstead of offering a second base package archive, we'd be probably better with offering PowerArchiver from the FG servers (with credits to the author somewhere), Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
