Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > This is just a small comparison between MSFS2004, MSFS2004/MegaScenery > (http://www.megascenery.com/) and FlightGear/VMap0 data. I don't think > any conclusions can be drawn from it, but it can be usefully and it is fun: > > > Default MS FlightSim 2004: > http://www.megascenery.com/images/ba3n.JPG > > MS FlightWim 2004 w. MegaScenery (satellite images): > http://www.megascenery.com/images/ba3w.JPG > > FlightGear VMap0: > http://www.a1.nl/~ehofman/fgfs/gallery/test/VanNuysCA.jpg > > Erik
The FlightGear view shows a lot more green, than is probably realistic. Is this the data or the way it is interpreted? Also, it looks like the MSFS basic uses more urban textures than FlightGear, arranged in a more random manner. You can see repeats, but not in a regular pattern. Best, Jim _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
