On Sunday 24 August 2003 00:57, David Culp wrote: > > It'll be a real pain developing and testing a/c if a new archive has to be > > created after each change. > > This might mean that unpacking the whole archive first, then reading, would be > best? This has the benefit of minimizing code changes as well. > > - OR - > > The reading can be made intelligent, so that --aircraft=F16 will be read in > the current way, and --aircraft=F16.tar.gz will be read in as an archive? > > Dave > > > -- > **************************** > David Culp > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ****************************
I guess it's a question of how much effort it would take to make FG work with both archived and unpacked files. It would be good to be able to run straight from an archive as it should help prevent problems with individual files getting corrupted or going missing, and other typical user problems. ;) LeeE _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
